Maine iGaming Bill Held Over by Gov. Janet Mills, Veto Likely

Maine iGaming Bill Held Over by Gov. Janet Mills, Veto Likely

Despite the state legislature’s efforts to liberalize online casino laws in Maine, Governor Janet Mills has opted not to act on the bill, leaving the future of iGaming uncertain.

Maine iGaming online casino tribal gaming

The Background of iGaming Legislation

Last month, the Maine State Legislature approved Legislative Document 1164, a bill aimed at providing exclusive rights for Maine’s four federally recognized tribes – the Maliseet, Micmac, Passamaquoddy, and Penobscot – to operate online casino games.

The Benefits of iGaming

The proposed legislation seeks to create economic opportunities for the Wabanaki Nations through internet gaming. If passed, it would generate approximately $19 million in annual revenue for the tribes and their partners, as well as create over $3.5 million in new state tax revenue.

Concerns Over iGaming

However, not everyone is supportive of the bill. Churchill Downs and Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc., which operate two brick-and-mortar casinos in Maine, oppose iGaming, citing concerns that it threatens their business model and could lead to increased problem gambling.

The Impact on Tribes

The Maine Indian Claims Settlement Act of 1980 significantly impacts the four tribes’ sovereign powers and benefits compared to federally recognized tribes in most other states. The state act restricts the tribes’ ability to benefit from certain federal policies, including the Indian Regulatory Gaming Act (IRGA).

The Role of Governor Mills

Governor Janet Mills has expressed opposition to additional gambling, including iGaming. Her administration has testified against the bill, and she has stated that she does not support increasing the number of gaming options in Maine.

Pocket Veto

Mills’ office received the tribal iGaming bill on June 25, but the governor has chosen not to act on it. If the State Legislature had reconvened, she would have had 10 days to sign or veto the bill. However, since the legislature was in recess, her inaction amounts to a de facto veto.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the future of iGaming in Maine remains uncertain due to Governor Mills’ decision not to act on the bill. While supporters argue that online casinos would provide economic benefits and consumer protections, opponents claim that it could lead to increased problem gambling and job losses.

Scroll to Top